Listen to the audio of today’s Reflection:
https://soundcloud.com/hapearce/reflection-for-october-20-2025
I Corinthians 15:20-31
20But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. 22For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. 23But each in turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. 24Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27For he “has put everything under his feet.” Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all.
29Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them? 30And as for us, why do we endanger ourselves every hour? 31I face death every day—yes, just as surely as I boast about you in Christ Jesus our Lord. 32If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus with no more than human hopes, what have I gained? If the dead are not raised,
“Let us eat and drink,
for tomorrow we die.”
Lots of people in our contemporary world doubt that Jesus actually rose from the dead – even some who call themselves ‘Christians.’ We actually have a couple in our church who formerly belonged to a church where the pastor said one year on Easter that he doubted the resurrection was a historical reality. Those people who call themselves Christians without believing in the resurrection are followers of Jesus in the same way followers of Karl Marx call themselves ‘Marxists’ and some psychotherapists call themselves ‘Freudians.’ They embrace his teachings without believing in the resurrection.
But the apostle Paul will have no part of the idea of a Christian faith without the resurrection. He says that without the resurrection, the whole thing is hollow. Without the resurrection you might as well put your trust in the teachings of a philosopher like Aristotle or Plato.
Having said that, how do followers of Jesus come to accept the historical reality of the resurrection, and regard it as the central event in human history? Three things serve as the foundation of our belief.
First of all, the New Testament is the best-preserved record in human history. No other set of documents in history has been subject to such rigorous checking and cross-checking as the New Testament. Teams of scholars have worked constantly throughout the 2000-year history of the church to ensure that the Christian scriptures are accurately translated and handed down. And those scriptures, mostly written and compiled by people who lived during the lifetime of Jesus, all state the unshakable conviction that he did in fact rise from the dead.
(And by the way, in case you’re wondering, we regard the Old Testament as somewhat less historically reliable, because some of the accounts seem to have been written down centuries after the events they relate. It seems that some of the historical books include a combination of actual history along with reflections on the theology of the Hebrew people.)
There’s also the great confidence the first Christians had in the truth of the story they were telling. The historical record shows that the eyewitnesses to the resurrection, when they went into the world to tell about their own encounters with the risen Christ, spoke with such absolute certainty about the resurrection that people throughout the known world left everything to follow Jesus.
The second pillar in our belief in the resurrection is that Jesus himself foretold that he would be killed and then rise from the dead. Again and again in his teachings, he plainly told those following him that this would come to pass. It was a teaching that shocked his disciples, but clearly Jesus regarded his death and resurrection as a necessary part of his mission on earth.
The cultural expectation among the Jews was that the Messiah would come as a military conqueror to drive out the Romans and re-establish a free and independent Israel. But Jesus did something very different – something nobody expected. There was absolutely no expectation among the Jews that the Messiah would personally die to reconcile humankind to God – or that he would then rise from the dead on the third day.
The fact that Jesus foretold his shocking death at the hands of his nation’s leaders – and that this prediction actually came true – provides powerful support to his matching assertion that he would then rise from the dead.
Finally, as we have said in past Reflections and will probably say again in future ones, the accounts of the death and resurrection of Jesus are so uncharacteristic of the ancient Hebrew world that it becomes harder to believe they were made up than that they are true.
Some people claim the leaders of the early church invented the resurrection in order to gain recruits for their new religion. But if they did, they invented stories that made themselves look terrible – like cowards who abandoned Jesus in his hour of greatest need. That’s not exactly the kind of story you make up if you’re trying to recruit followers to a religious movement you’re establishing.
And what’s more, the stories in the gospels all say that the first ones to discover the resurrection were women. In the ancient Hebrew world, that would instantly cast into doubt the veracity of the story, because women were regarded as unreliable witnesses. Their testimony was discounted in a court of law. (And Mary Magdalene might even have been a former victim of mental illness.) So nobody in the ancient world would have made up a story like that. They would only have reported the story the way they did if they absolutely believed it to be true.
The historical credibility of the accounts of the death and resurrection of Jesus is also bolstered by the fact that they include some ‘extraneous information’ – like the fact that some people heard Jesus speaking on the cross and mistakenly thought he was calling to Elijah. The presence of that kind of extraneous information doesn’t really add anything to the story, but it’s considered evidence that those who reported it believed that they were reporting a true and factual account.
Finally, the lives of the early leaders of the church bear witness to their certainty that they had encountered the risen Christ. After running and hiding when Jesus was crucified, they then re-emerged on the world stage a few days later. And when they did, they were so bold and confident in their faith that they were willing to be killed as Jesus had been. What changed them from cowards to fearless martyrs? They said it was their encounters with the risen Christ that convinced them that death no longer had power over them.
These are the reasons we believe in the truth of the resurrection of Jesus. As Paul said twenty centuries ago, that belief is the heart of our faith – and of our confidence that we will someday share in that resurrection.
Let’s pray. Lord, we thank you for the great demonstration of your love for us that took place on the cross, and for the living hope we share as believers in the resurrection of Jesus. Give us the confidence and the words to share that hope with those around us who have not yet come to believe. Amen.
Grace and Peace,
Henry
Recent Comments